Buddha vs Child paradigm

 

Buddha vs Child Paradigm


“Artificial Intelligence (AI) is like a child, who needs time to learn and adapt, whereas a typical IT system is like Buddha who knows everything about the problem it was supposed to solve.”   
          - Devesh Rajadhyax, Founder, Cere Labs.


Let us in this post try to elaborate on this Buddha vs Child Paradigm which Devesh coined for 
differentiating between conventional IT systems and AI. It is essential to know the difference because it 
helps in building the right kind of attitude towards implementing AI systems. A typical IT system such as 
ERP does the job for what it was implemented. It is assumed that it will solve the problem for what it was 
made. Take for example an accounting system like Tally. It will help you to manage your accounts in highly
accurate manner. This system is like a Buddha, who is enlightened from the start. We can’t expect it to do
any mistakes (except the initial software bugs that are rectified). Or take for example a calculator. 
A calculator will always give you 1+2 = 3, no matter you do this operation million times assuming that 
the calculator is in a working condition. Thus we expect an IT system to work perfectly, and it does indeed.

But take an AI system. A typical AI system learns from data. Initially it is like a child, finding it difficult to 
even crawl, but slowly and steadily it learns how to walk as it is exposed to more situations which in the 
case of AI is more data. Maturity of an AI system comes with more and more exposure to data. 
In the example of calculator, an AI system will get many examples such as  1+2 = 3, and over a period 
of time it will learn how to perform addition. Initially it might fail to predict 3, but it will come closer and 
closer to 3.

As you have noticed there is a paradigm shift in understanding and using an AI system compared to an 
IT system. Let us summarize few differences…


IT System
AI System
Matured to solve the problem right from 
the start it was supposed to.
Keeps getting matured as it is exposed to 
more data.
Results are expected to be accurate.
Results keep improving.
Patience by IT executives is only required 
till implementation.
Patience is required throughout the lifetime 
of the system.
Mistakes in output can’t be tolerated.
Mistakes in output can be tolerated.
100% accuracy.
Accuracy tries to reach 100%, but is 
mostly probabilistic.

AI systems are the only option to solve problems which are not well defined, such as prediction or
anomaly. That’s why people tolerate its childish behavior.

Thus it is essential to understand this difference between an IT system and an AI system. It will help an 
executive to assist AI researchers and engineers in achieving great results over a period of time.

Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Popular posts from this blog

Can language models reason?

Image
  Illustration by Rajashree Rajadhyax Large language models are an impressive technology that excels at providing answers based on vast knowledge of the world. However, they often struggle with reasoning and logic-based questions. To overcome this limitation, the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) method was introduced. This technique emulates how humans solve problems by reasoning step-by-step. Just as we break down complex problems into smaller, manageable parts for analysis and logical resolution, CoT guides language models to adopt a similar approach. By mimicking this natural, structured problem-solving process, CoT enhances the models’ ability to handle logic-driven tasks with greater accuracy and reliability. This approach, however, requires more time and computational effort because it involves processing more tokens . Tokens are the building blocks of text, like words or parts of words, that the model uses to understand and generate responses. Since the Chain-of-Thought method involv...
Read more

AI implementation myths

Image
  Visionary leaders recognize the importance of adopting cutting-edge technologies to enhance their business operations. This is a bold move, especially in the early stages when few businesses have embraced it. Generative AI is currently at such a juncture. Although AI has experienced several setbacks over the years, recent advancements in foundational models like large language models (LLMs) have reignited interest and investment in the field. Generative AI never fails to impress those who see it in action. At Cere Labs, my company, we have developed a Gen AI framework, and whenever I demonstrate it, the feedback is unanimously positive, with many stating it is "useful." However, despite this enthusiasm, there is hesitation when it comes to integrating this technology into business practices. Addressing certain misconceptions and concerns could help leaders more easily adopt Generative AI to enhance their operations. With my 8 years of experience assisting businesses in inco...
Read more

Homework 2.0: The science behind homework and why it still matters in the AI age!

Image
  Illustration by Rajashree Rajadhyax I recently came across an article about how teachers are coming up with methods to distinguish between homework done by students and that done by AI. This effort by teachers is not without cause; a recent case in Massachusetts saw a student penalized for using AI in their history paper, highlighting the need for such measures. I found it intriguing and couldn’t help but reflect on this shifting trend.  Homework! Does that word bring back memories? The race to finish it as fast as possible so you could finally go play! Holidays would’ve been so much better without it, don’t you think? I know I felt that way, and I’m pretty sure you did too. And let’s not forget those classmates with endless excuses for not doing it. The most common one? “I wasn’t feeling well!” 🤒 Some would even throw in a few coughs just to make it believable 😏. I was that kid on the opposite end. Just before a holiday, I’d be sneaking in some homework during lunch break...
Read more